![]() Its relatively easy to use if you've used other HMI packages. "Classic" Intouch has been around for ages. Oh, and if you want to install just InTouch, you still need the full 4.5+ GB file repository of all things System Platform to just install InTouch. I cringe anytime I have to touch a System Platform project, "Hokey", "undeploy/redepoy", "uninstall/reinstall" are all descriptors and solutions proposed by technical support. The platform also has options for historian, reporting, device connectivity, central management and deployment.īest of luck! Make friends with your local WW distributor, get signed up for their WDN (knowledge base, previously called Wonderware Developers Network) and find things you can throw in the office that won't cause serious injury! net script functions, all kinds of "Engines", can't forget "Galaxies", as well as the new IDE. System Platform introduced "Archestra" graphics, Objects/templates. Within this platform ,"InTouch" still exists and and really has duties as the "Visualization", albeit that's not entirely accurate thanks to WW's fudged up licensing options. System Platform, well it's a "platform" which connects various types of software services. InTouch, historically speaking would be an "HMI" project, but at the same time it did evolve into a SCADA product and was pretty powerful. There is no brief explanation to that one! Citect seems to be a competing offering (originally part of Schneider?). I get the sense that they are moving toward a single IDE, kind of like Rockwell FTView Studio manages both ME and SE applications.Īlso noticed OASys which appears to be marketed toward Oil and Gas. To make things a little more confusing for me, from what I've read there seems to be a lot of info about InTouch interoperability with System Platform. Not quite clear on the difference between the two InTouch platforms. I understand (roughly) InTouch is HMI and System Platform is SCADA. System Platform (formerly Archestra System Platform?) InTouch Edge (InTouch Machine Edition?) The Wonderware / Aveva website outlines a few different products, and I'm not sure the difference between them. With the transfer of IP between Invensys / Schneider, and Aveva, I'm a little confused on how the different products are positioned, who the target end-user is, and potential use cases. I'm going to be working on some InTouch and System Platform projects - I've not worked with WonderWare before and am wondering if someone could give me a quick run-down of the different HMI/SCADA offerings so I can wrap my heads around their potential applications. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
December 2022
Categories |